Our travel luck has run out

My wife and I just got back from a long weekend trip with friends.  We’ve been to the greater Playa del Carmen area of Mexico a bunch of times. We figured that this would be an easy trip.  And for the most part it was.

Hotel Basico, as always, was awesome. The rooftop bar and pool is great. The food is amazing. I’m not sure how they do it, but the fried fish nuggets are amazing. 

Playa, sadly, is slowly being turned into a more rustic Cancun.  It became noticeable last time we went and this time it was all too obvious. More stumbling drunk idiots and more chain stores. This is not a good trend.

For a change of pace, we headed down to Tulum to check things out there. Overall, we liked the area. There is, however, a fundamental problem with area’s value proposition. Most of the hotels are on the water and are rustic.  We had some very serene moments just watching the waves roll in.  But that being said, the price per night for one of these hotels seems to average about $170. That just is too high a shower whose pressure resembles a Windex bottle and a room that lacks A/C.  At $100 or less, the value prop works, but I just have a hard time paying for what I know to be a glorified back packer flophouse. (And in case you think I am being a snob, I have spent many a night in low budget hotels around the world and loved them. Much love to Archie’s House.)

The beginning of the beginning: our privacy report publishes

Over the last 6 or so months, Bob Blakley and I have been doing a lot of listening and thinking about privacy.  To successfully re-launch our privacy coverage, we needed to lay a wide foundation that would serve to support future research.  We needed to provide a meaningful starting point for our customers.  Since our customers’ jobs are not typically focused on privacy, we needed to start with a form of first principles and build outward. 

I’ve learned that it is generally frowned upon to use the second person in our reports – too informal I am told.  Use the blog if you want to address the audience directly.  Normally, I don’t have a problem avoiding the second person, but this report proved to be a challenge.  We had to work hard not to write without using “you.”  And why was that? Privacy discussions are and must be inclusive.  They involve each of us on a far more personal level than a discussion of, say, account lifecycle management.   Cognizant of privacy implications or not, the decisions you make on a daily basis have effects the privacy of your customers and partners.

Because privacy is personal, because it requires concerted behavior throughout the enterprise, discussions about privacy must include everyone.  You.  Me.  Everyone. To guide concerted behavior, in our recently released privacy report, we put forth a Golden Rule as a means of developing and evaluating privacy principles leadings to practices and behaviors: