<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Context and Intent: Nishant kicks the RBAC hornet&#8217;s nest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/07/10/context-and-intent-nishant-kicks-the-rbac-hornets-nest.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/07/10/context-and-intent-nishant-kicks-the-rbac-hornets-nest.html</link>
	<description>spots of thoughts: ian glazer and friends rant, rave and ruminate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maildir.net Mailling list archive &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Delving deeper into Relationship-based RBAC</title>
		<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/07/10/context-and-intent-nishant-kicks-the-rbac-hornets-nest.html/comment-page-1#comment-14726</link>
		<dc:creator>Maildir.net Mailling list archive &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Delving deeper into Relationship-based RBAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tuesdaynight.org/?p=367#comment-14726</guid>
		<description>[...] Glazer thinks that I have opened Pandora&#8217;s box by talking about the need to bring context and intent into the area of RBAC by using relationships [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Glazer thinks that I have opened Pandora&#8217;s box by talking about the need to bring context and intent into the area of RBAC by using relationships [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don’t be hating on my lady &#171; Identity Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/07/10/context-and-intent-nishant-kicks-the-rbac-hornets-nest.html/comment-page-1#comment-14724</link>
		<dc:creator>Don’t be hating on my lady &#171; Identity Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tuesdaynight.org/?p=367#comment-14724</guid>
		<description>[...] at the NIST RBAC model and finds it wanting. Dave Kearns agrees. Ian Glazer throws his two cents in here. So a government agency takes on defining something as contentious as RBAC and the results are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at the NIST RBAC model and finds it wanting. Dave Kearns agrees. Ian Glazer throws his two cents in here. So a government agency takes on defining something as contentious as RBAC and the results are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

