<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poorly spent funds: Surveillance cameras in DC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html</link>
	<description>spots of thoughts: ian glazer and friends rant, rave and ruminate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.C. to expand surveillance camera program @ ian glazer's tuesdaynight</title>
		<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html/comment-page-1#comment-16536</link>
		<dc:creator>D.C. to expand surveillance camera program @ ian glazer's tuesdaynight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html#comment-16536</guid>
		<description>[...] in our public education system, the city is looking to expand its surveillance program. As I have mentioned before, there are strong evidence that CCTV surveillance doesn&#8217;t lower the crime rate and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in our public education system, the city is looking to expand its surveillance program. As I have mentioned before, there are strong evidence that CCTV surveillance doesn&#8217;t lower the crime rate and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: But its such a lovely panopticon, I&#8217;d hate to have to return it @ ian glazer's tuesdaynight</title>
		<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html/comment-page-1#comment-15535</link>
		<dc:creator>But its such a lovely panopticon, I&#8217;d hate to have to return it @ ian glazer's tuesdaynight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html#comment-15535</guid>
		<description>[...] I have mentioned previously on Tuesdaynight, trading the feeling of safety (without an actual increase in safety) for an invasive, always-on, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have mentioned previously on Tuesdaynight, trading the feeling of safety (without an actual increase in safety) for an invasive, always-on, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Lawn Paint</title>
		<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html/comment-page-1#comment-15273</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Lawn Paint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 13:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html#comment-15273</guid>
		<description>and it is pure security theater.  I have written about the “security” cameras in my neighborhood and my concerns about who has access to them.  Further the number of mobile surveillance units is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and it is pure security theater.  I have written about the “security” cameras in my neighborhood and my concerns about who has access to them.  Further the number of mobile surveillance units is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Angry</title>
		<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html/comment-page-1#comment-14973</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Angry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 06:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html#comment-14973</guid>
		<description>Well, on one hand we have protection from those that will do us harm.

On the other hand we have a whole new world that a lot of people consider to be a George Orwell type surveillance society.

Which one is the best for us? I believe that is open for debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, on one hand we have protection from those that will do us harm.</p>
<p>On the other hand we have a whole new world that a lot of people consider to be a George Orwell type surveillance society.</p>
<p>Which one is the best for us? I believe that is open for debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SVAT Security Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html/comment-page-1#comment-14921</link>
		<dc:creator>SVAT Security Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html#comment-14921</guid>
		<description>Ian,  I&#039;m find this kind of system very interesting.  It&#039;s not much different than the systems they use in London.  One can&#039;t walk anywhere in London these day&#039;s without being watched by a security camera.  Good? Bad? hard to tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian,  I&#8217;m find this kind of system very interesting.  It&#8217;s not much different than the systems they use in London.  One can&#8217;t walk anywhere in London these day&#8217;s without being watched by a security camera.  Good? Bad? hard to tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trip report from the Privacy Symposium @ ian glazer's tuesdaynight</title>
		<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html/comment-page-1#comment-14797</link>
		<dc:creator>Trip report from the Privacy Symposium @ ian glazer's tuesdaynight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html#comment-14797</guid>
		<description>[...] and it is pure security theater.  I have written about the &#8220;security&#8221; cameras in my neighborhood and my concerns about who has access to them.  Further the number of mobile surveillance units is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and it is pure security theater.  I have written about the &#8220;security&#8221; cameras in my neighborhood and my concerns about who has access to them.  Further the number of mobile surveillance units is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schneier on CCTV in the Guardian @ tuesdaynight</title>
		<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html/comment-page-1#comment-14727</link>
		<dc:creator>Schneier on CCTV in the Guardian @ tuesdaynight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html#comment-14727</guid>
		<description>[...] my thread on CCTV cameras (here and here), Bruce Schneier wrote a solid summation of the issues of pervasive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my thread on CCTV cameras (here and here), Bruce Schneier wrote a solid summation of the issues of pervasive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Follow-up on &#8220;Surveillance Cameras in DC&#8221; @ tuesdaynight</title>
		<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html/comment-page-1#comment-14715</link>
		<dc:creator>Follow-up on &#8220;Surveillance Cameras in DC&#8221; @ tuesdaynight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html#comment-14715</guid>
		<description>[...] Surveillance Camera RegulationJust a brief follow-up to my previous comments.  DC has written its regulations for this camera consolidation.  I have copied a version here.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Surveillance Camera RegulationJust a brief follow-up to my previous comments.  DC has written its regulations for this camera consolidation.  I have copied a version here.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark MacAuley</title>
		<link>http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html/comment-page-1#comment-14638</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark MacAuley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2008/04/10/poorly-spent-funds-surveillance-cameras-in-dc.html#comment-14638</guid>
		<description>Ian,

This seems akin to the show at any US airport. How much have we spent on &#039;security&#039; at airports, and how much of it actually prevents crimes? 

Seems like they should have installed those cameras at the borders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian,</p>
<p>This seems akin to the show at any US airport. How much have we spent on &#8216;security&#8217; at airports, and how much of it actually prevents crimes? </p>
<p>Seems like they should have installed those cameras at the borders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

